Copyright 1996 by Harvey Robbins & Michael Finley; all rights reserved.

     

     Assessing Individuals

By now you are curious what you are: a reactive or a proactive. Or worst case, a metamaniac or a metamoron. Here is an informal quiz you can use, or adapt to your own organization. It tells you where you align yourself, on a scale of ranges describing change potential.

You can test yourself. If you are on a team that is really comfortable with one another, you can also score one another's change quotients, and then compare how you scored yourself versus how they score you.

Most people taking this test are very generous with assessments of themselves; and much less generous assessing others. This is a great way to start a fist-fight, so have a care.

A third way to use the test is to fill it out as if you were another person, observing you.

On each line are seven circles, marking your attitude from one extreme of a continuum to the other. If a 1, 4, or 7 statement sounds too extreme, but close, mark an in-between circle, a 2, 3, 5, or 6.

Answers falling on the left side of the bell curve suggest an inelasticity of personality; answers on the right indicate way too much elasticity. The far left is the realm of neurotic control, in which the will perpetually frustrates itself. The far right is the realm of no control -- an intense unfettered region similar to clinical psychosis.


 

The value of this test is that it begins the necessary process of familiarization. The resuls are informal, so the point is not to file them away in a confidential cabinet, but to use it as a conversation starter. People should test and score themselves, and discuss with their team whether they agree or not with the results. It is not pleasant, even with an off-the-record tests like this, to be told you are any kind of maniac, much less a moron. But it is important that people who do have constitutional problems with change acknowledge the fact. It alters their expectations, and the team's expectations of them. It may even serve as a Push tool to get them thinking about ways they can do better.

Ideally, you will want yourself and your team to score generally close to the middle. It's not a catastrophe if there is a spread; you can balance out one another's proclivities. It probably is a catastrophe if you are all lumped on one end, or if there is no strong center.

Your Change Personality

 

REACTIVE

ó

PROACTIVE

   FLEXIBILITY

How able are you to change your behavior at will?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Unable and unwilling.

 

 

Able and willing, if the cause is attractive.

 

 

Couldn't stop if I tried.

   RECEPTIVITY

How open are you to new ideas?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Sphincter-
tight. I know what I like, and that's all I want to know.

 

 

I enjoy stepping outside the box and hearing a fresh viewpoint.

 

 

I live for new ideas. My problem is following through on any of them.

   STATUS

How able are you to change right now?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Too stressed out in my life as a whole to give a work idea its due.

 

 

Looking for an opportunity to try something new in my job.

 

 

I'm ready to go, no matter what the idea is.

   DISTRESS

How might you describe your curent level of negative stress?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Kill me. I'm maxed out. My confidence is low and my attention span is for the birds.

 

 

Copacetic. Things are going well for me at home, and I feel I can handle a new challenge.

 

 

Feeling no stress whatsoever -- the gears may be stripped.

  PATIENCE

How patient are you in the face of change? How comfortable are you with delayed gratification?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

I like results ASAP. I can't go forward unless my results are assured.

 

 

I am willing to wait for results if I have reason to think they will be coming.

 

 

I can wait forever. I don't care about results.

   LOCUS OF CONTROL

Do you focus on yourself or outside yourself?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

I can only be concerned right now about me and my survival.

 

 

I feel I have found a good balance between taking care of myself and offering my contributions to others.

 

 

I am not important. All that matters is the success and well-being of the group.

   MINDSPACE

What is your natural time orientation?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Right now, today. I can't think of long-term ramifications or the Big Picture.

 

 

I am comfortable with long time frames, but understand that goals are achieved in increments.

 

 

I do't even think about time. Whatever happens will happen.

   DIVERSITY

How do you feel about differentness -- the "otherness" of other people's ideas?

m

m

m

m

m

m

m

I have trouble subscribing to an idea I know I could never have come up with.

 

 

I welcome ideas from people who are different from me.

 

 

Unless an idea comes from outside my immediate circle, I'm not interested in it.


 

Scoring: There are 8 questions and 7 possible points per question, a top score would be 56. You don't want that. Here is the range:

8-10

14-30

31-55

52-56

Metamoron

Metaphobe

Metaphile

Metamaniac

It's no coincidence Bob Cratchit worked for Ebenezer Scrooge. Fat for the fryer.

You can change well with the right combination of Push, then Pull.

The changemaking ideal. Ideal candidate for all Push program.

Way too much of a good thing. Organizational equivalent of idiot savant.

     Expanding the Change Space

Return to the metaphor of fixing the lightning rod during a lightning storm while being attacked by beeshornets. The storm was the global change engulfing your organization. The lightning rod was the organizational change implemented to meet the global change head on. The hornets were workers' individual change stressors, distracting them from and making the organizational change more difficult.

The more stress your situation piles upon you, the smaller your change space becomes. It is a paradox: instead of getting better at change, the more of it you are asked to do, the worse you get at it. Piled-on change, with no time allotted for reenergizing, causes most people's change potential to diminish: burnout.

"There is a word for the absence of stress -- death."
Hans Selye

Interestingly, this is less true for proactives. The reason is that metaphiles and metamaniacs are so constituted that they do not let everyday change stress to snowball into intolerable distress.

Now is a good time to point out that it is a good thing we are not all metaphiles, as they can be reckless and insensitive. But we can all learn a few tricks from them.

 As you increase a person's stress levels from any of the three sources of stress mentioned earlier, make sure people are able to re-energize their stress tolerance reserves. Use active methods such as focus group discussions to share feelings of anxiety produced by the change. Encourage people to make time for exercise, to follow a diet that helps combat stress, and to adopt relaxation techniques like meditation or catharsis.

Other stress-reduction ideas:

                 ƒ  Be optimistic. Most metaphiles stay aloft because they are engrossed in a positive, enjoyable way with the change occurring around them. When other people see manure, metaphiles know a pony must be nearby. They survive change in large part because they have pledged allegiance to it.

                 ƒ  Be pessimistic, sort of. Accepting may be a better word. In its simplest form, it is simply a shrug. Most change is not fun. But if it is unpleasant, and unavoidable, why not adopt an attitude of bemused fatalism about it? "You can't stop progress" is both an American anthem and an American elegy: the natural metaphile makes the best of a substandard situation.

                 ƒ  Focus on the trunk. Change weakens ordinary people because we try to grasp all of its implications at once, and it causes our brains to heat up. Like writing a book, it can only be done a chapter at a time. The blind men of Industan could only describe an elephant in terms of the part they were currently touching. Their elephant descriptions were never complete, but at least they were not trampled by the elephant's totality. There is sanity, even in the world of total participation and cross-functionality, in knowing your part and focusing on it.

                 ƒ  Vent. Create and make frequent use of your support network -- whatever combination of people from among your bosses, co-workers, subordinates, friends, family, and if all else fails, your dog. They are there to talk to and to cry on the shoulder of. The more, the merrier. It is surprising how much stress we can put up with if we just have the occasional opportunity to complain. Bitch about it, then get it behind you. Every parent knows there are two kinds of children: the child that complains about having to take out the trash, but then does it, and the child who utters no sound of disagreement, but doesn't take the trash out, either.

                 ƒ  If stress is preventing your team from addressing change needs, maybe you need to address your lunchpail first. A common reaction to stress is rising blood pressure. People under stress often cope by ingesting fatty and salty foods -- the very things that drive blood pressure higher. x

 

 

[IMAGE]NOW AVAILABLE from from Berrett-Koehler Publishers (San Francisco) and Texere (UK)!
The New WHY TEAMS DON'T WORK
What Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right
a fully revised second edition of this award-winning classic
by Harvey Robbins and Michael Finley
Paperback
"The American business approach to workplace teams is filled with powerful subtleties and is also quite different from the Japanese. The phrase, "How come all this quality stuff don't work," nicely sums up the challenge making teams work in America. Authors Robbins and Finley present practical solutions to the problems with and misconceptions about teams that will be valuable to any organization inclined to assign teams to work on legitimate operational issues. Pragmatic team tips covered here include team decision-making, communication skills with teams, reward and recognition ideas, the importance of effective team leadership, and the fundamental factor of organizational culture that could help or hinder team success. The authors swap narration of chapters, enlivening this useful handbook on how to make the commitment to teams a success. Serves well any manager's interest in maximizing productivity and quality improvement with teams. Recommended for all quality professionals." -- Quality World
Winner, Financial Times/Booz Allen & Hamilton Global Business Book Award, Best Management Book - The Americas, 1995

Why Change Doesn't Work : Why Initiatives Go Wrong and How to Try Again-And Succeed
by Harvey Robbins, Michael Finley
"This is the first treatise on change we've seen that is actually entertaining. The authors cover human and organizational barriers to change and change theories, and then take a tour of management theory that's guaranteed to upset every reader at one point or another." -- HR ONLINE
Price: $11.96
Paperback
Published by Peterson's
Publication date: October 1, 1997
ISBN: 1560799447

Why Change Doesn't Work
by Harvey Robbins and Michael Finley
(Pacesetter, 231 pages, $24.95)

Click Here!

Did you tip your writer?

I enjoyed serving this essay up for you, and I did it for free. If you'd like to contribute to this site, however, to keep it up and humming, consider dropping a $1 tip in the "Honor Box" here. Think of it as a voluntary subscription. Just click the CLICK TO PAY image here. Thanks! - Mike

Total tips, year to date: $203.00 - MANY THANKS!

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Robert K. Cooper, Ph.D., advisor to organizational leaders and best-selling author of "The Performance Edge" and "Executive EQ"
 
HOME | ALL STORIES
Visit Amazon.com